Supreme Court allows Trump to lay off nearly 1,400 Education Department employees
A security guard walks past the U.S. Department of Education headquarters in Washington, D.C., March 12, 2025.
Nathan Howard | Reuters
TheĀ Supreme CourtĀ is allowing PresidentĀ Donald TrumpĀ to put his plan to dismantle theĀ Education DepartmentĀ back on track and go through with laying off nearly 1,400 employees.
With the three liberal justices in dissent, the court on Monday paused an order from U.S. District JudgeĀ Myong JounĀ inĀ Boston, who issued a preliminary injunction reversing the layoffs and calling into question the broader plan.
The layoffs “will likely cripple the department,” Joun wrote. A federal appeals court refused to put the order on hold while the administration appealed.
The high court action enables the administration to resume work on winding down the department, one of Trump’s biggest campaign promises.
The court did not explain its decision in favor of Trump, as is customary in emergency appeals.
But in dissent, JusticeĀ Sonia SotomayorĀ complained that her colleagues were enabling legally questionable action on the part of the administration.
“When the Executive publicly announces its intent to break the law, and then executes on that promise, it is the Judiciary’s duty to check that lawlessness, not expedite it,” Sotomayor wrote for herself and JusticesĀ Ketanji Brown JacksonĀ andĀ Elena Kagan.
Education DepartmentĀ employees who were targeted by the layoffs have been on paid leave since March, according to a union that represents some of the agency’s staff.
Joun’s order had prevented the department from fully terminating them, though none had been allowed to return to work, according to theĀ American Federation of Government Employees Local 252. Without Joun’s order, the workers would have been terminated in early June.
TheĀ Education DepartmentĀ had said earlier in June that it was “actively assessing how to reintegrate” the employees. A department email asked them to share whether they had gained other employment, saying the request was meant to “support a smooth and informed return to duty.”
The current case involves two consolidated lawsuits that said Trump’s plan amounted to an illegal closure of theĀ Education Department.
One suit was filed by theĀ SomervilleĀ andĀ EasthamptonĀ school districts inĀ MassachusettsĀ along with theĀ American Federation of TeachersĀ and other education groups. The other suit was filed by a coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general.
The suits argued that layoffs left the department unable to carry out responsibilities required byĀ Congress, including duties toĀ support special education,Ā distribute financial aidĀ andĀ enforce civil rights laws.
This article was originally published by a Cnbc.com. Read the Original article here. .

